THE NICHOLS/NICHOLLS FAMILY
LIMEBURNERS OF CHARLTON
AND WHYTELEAFE.
AND WHYTELEAFE.
By
Paul W. Sowan
Barbara Ludlow’s short item (A unique site
at Charlton: Nichols's lime kilns, later the Crown Fuel Company and Greenwich
Pottery) in Greenwich Industrial History
4(3), May 2001, page 1, is of considerable interest to me, as in 1997 I
collected some information on E.G. (Fred) Nicholls' two limeworks in east
Surrey. This was summarised in a short
article (E.G. Nicholls' Whyteleafe limeworks) published in the Bourne Society Bulletin 170 (November
1997). pp. 15 - 17. The Bourne Society
concerns itself with the local history of a number of east Surrey parishes
centred on Caterham and Coulsdon. I had also identified the Crown Fuel Company
as being involved with the Riddlesdown or Rose and Crown limeworks. Barbara
Ludlow's note tells me much more about the Nicholls family (despite the variant
spellings, they are evidently all the same family) and the Crown
Fuel Company.
Charlton and
Greenwich readers may like to have the following east Surrey details to
complete their picture.
The two Surrey
limeworks with which the family were concerned were the Riddlesdown (or Rose
and Crown) limeworks, of which the large chalk pit remains a conspicuous
feature on the east side of the A22 at Whyteleafe; it is best seen from trains
crossing the viaduct on the 'Oxted line' between Riddlesdown and Upper
Warlingham stations. This pit appears to have been commenced in or about 1824
(a date taken from some 20th century company letterhead), and was already a
major obstacle to the construction of the railway from 1865 onwards, hence the
viaduct. The part of the pit east of the
viaduct is now operated as a closed nature reserve by the City of London,
although I recall visiting the limeworks when they were still a going concern
in the 1960s. The much smaller and shorter-lived Whiteleafe (or Whyteleafe)
limeworks was also on the east side of the main road and railway line, about a
mile further south, south of Upper Warlingham station. The Whyteleafe works are
not shewn on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey large scale maps and plans,
surveyed in 1867; but they do appear on the contract plans and sections for the
railway, dated 1880 (the railway was commenced as the Surrey & Sussex
Junction Railway, but failed, and was completed later as the Croydon, Oxted
& East Grinstead Railway which opened in 1884). The site is now occupied by
modern houses and a small recreation ground off Hillside Road. The latter pit
had a standard gauge rail link, but such a link was impossible from the viaduct
high above the kilns at the larger pit.
As a result of the Quarries Act, 1894, all open pits
for mineral working over 20 feet deep were subject to inspection and
regulation. Both pits fell into this category. The Act came into effect on 1
January 1895, but it took HM Inspector of Mines and Quarries for the North
Wales & Isle of Man District (which district included Surrey.) a few years
to identify, list and visit the large number of open pits added to his workload.
Data for the two pits is published from 1897 onwards, and I have ready access
to figures for this and the three following years. Nicholls' local manager was
one A.E. Mead, and the men employed 'inside' and 'outside' the two pits
averaged 15 and 4 for the smaller pit and 11 and 2 for the much larger one. No
accidents or prosecutions are on record for either pit for the period 1897-1900
(Clement Le Neve Foster was an enthusiastic prosecutor of quarry operators who
failed to observe the requirements of the Quarries Act and of the Factory Acts
(he was also Inspector of Factories). As
far as limeworks are concerned Surrey directories show Nicholls still in
possession of both pits up to 1924 but that for 1927 represents him only as a
coal merchant. By the 1930 directory neither Nicholls nor the Whyteleafe
limeworks are listed. Clearly reading as wide a range as possible of local
society newsletters might well lead to a lot of jigsaw puzzle pieces being
fitted together.
this article appeared in the September 2001 GIHS Newsletter
No comments:
Post a Comment